Evidentiality in Phi
A practice companion to the manual
This pamphlet practices Phi's four evidential particles (hi, I witnessed it; ke, I infer it; ti, someone told me; ho, I assume it) until choosing among them is as unconscious as choosing a tense. The machinery is the manual's: chapter 16 owns the doctrine, and this pamphlet never restates what it can point to. What the manual cannot give you is volume, and volume is what turns a grammatical option into a habit of mind.
The primer's last grammar chapter ends on the sentence this pamphlet serves: Phi does not ask you to be certain. It asks you to be exact about how you are not. Exactness under uncertainty is a skill, and skills are built by repetition. Expect drills.
By the end of this pamphlet, you will:
- Hear the difference between the four sources before you finish hearing the sentence
- Place any evidential correctly in the Slot 1 stack without counting on your fingers
- Choose between
hiandkeat the boundary where witnessing shades into reading signs - Choose between
keandhoat the boundary where evidence shades into expectation - Keep
tihonest across chains of retelling, and layered under reported speech - Say true things about other minds without trespassing on them
- Keep a journal in the three-line form, where evidentiality does its quietest work
This pamphlet assumes the particle system (manual ch9), tense and aspect (ch14), and the complementizers (ch19); the reportative chapter leans on that last one. It is a companion to manual Part IV, chapter 16.
Contents:
- Four sources, one stack
- Witness:
hi - Signs:
ke - Word:
ti - Expectation:
ho - Choosing and combining
- The honest journal
- Common errors
- Exercises
- Appendix: quick reference
"theula miona shewo haolu." Everyone spoke truly. Not everyone knew the same way; that is the point.